If You’re a Moral Person, the Feds Don’t Want You in Power…
The Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, Roy Moore, has been
disciplined for a “crime” with a punishment that is ugly, vindictive and
far beyond reasonable. But worse, Judge Moore’s “crime” isn’t a crime
at all, making this sordid affair almost unbelievable. The media has
remained silent on the matter.
Just what was Judge Moore’s egregious crime? He followed both the US
and Alabama Constitutions. He told probate officers in his state to
ignore federal orders concerning gay marriage. He refused to step aside
and capitulate to federal officers who violated state and federal laws
to control marriage in Alabama.
This was not Judge Moore’s first action to defend the law. In 2003 he
refused to remove a monument bearing the Ten Commandments from a state
building—another unconstitutional demand.
Judge Moore has been suspended from his position as Chief Justice of
the Alabama Supreme Court. The punishment imposed also denies him not
only his salary, but benefits
and retirement. While the court
did not specifically prohibit his future as a judge, its members would
know (being judges, themselves) that Alabama law prevents Judge Moore
from serving in another judgeship because of his age (he will be past
70), and Judicial Canon prevents him seeking any employment outside his
judicial role.
Thus, he cannot be a judge, he cannot get any job other than as a
judge and he has no retirement or benefits. He is left with no way to
provide for himself into his old age.
This punishment is inhumane.
As Usual, the Federal Government Goes Against the Constitution
The entire matter has been conducted as a clandestine, secret
proceeding, with multiple violations of the law. First, any punishment
meted out requires the unanimous vote of the nine judges on the Alabama
Court of the Judiciary. The vote was not unanimous. This, alone, should
have dismissed the case. Second, the punishment was invented—it is
unlawful. Third, the punishment is vindictive, hateful and extreme.
It is a serious matter when judges, whose duty it is to preserve law,
violate it willfully. It is a serious matter when the federal
government bullies states in matters where it has no voice or business.
(It is also a serious matter when citizens passively allow this without
crying out in disgust.)
Many Americans believe we must do what the federal government says.
Not true. Instead, we must insist the government obey its law—the
Constitution—which says the federal government has no authority in
marriage policies. But states also violate laws, as Alabama has proven,
and we must insist they obey the law, as well.
The government at all levels is bullying us. Judge Moore is a
courageous pioneer, of sorts, who stood up to both the federal
government and his state. Kim Davis, the Kentucky clerk who stood firm
against issuing gay marriage licenses, did the same.
The issue is not gay marriage, it is obedience to law. Amendment 10
to the US Constitution makes all powers not specifically assigned
therein to the federal government a matter for the states. Marriage is
not assigned to federal authority; it is a state matter. Amendment 774
of the Alabama Constitution, the Sanctity of Marriage amendment,
validates Judge Moore’s actions.
Without the Protection that Laws Provide, We’re in Trouble
Laws are protective barriers. Destroy one and all are in jeopardy of
being wiped away, due to the precedent set. Laws protect family,
property that is essential to provide for our needs, our right to
worship God, to speak, to associate with others as we choose—everything
about our way of life. The law must be preserved.
Judge Moore has been made an example by activists trying to change our way of life and community morals
Liberty Counsel is defending him. Bless them for doing so—they deserve our thanks!
